In Atwood’s narrative, the entire context uses satire in a way that she makes fun of a naive conception that an individual can have a simple happy ending (Mead 39-47). “Happy Endings” by Margret Atwood and “Hills like White Elephants” by Hemingway are two short stories, with different meaning. Nonetheless, the advanced technology that develops yearly will make it easier in filtering the required data. The use of many sources is important since it will allow more information to be accessed. The methods to use in this paper are essential and effective, since they determine the quality of evidence used. The terms to consider in finding articles and academic sources are, symbolism, metaphor, literally setting in “Hills Like White Elephants” and “Happy Endings.” The data will be retrieved from an article if only it clearly illustrates the literal connection between the two stories. The sources used were based within the time range of 2009-2018 to make sure the data is up to date. A research strategy to identify the comparison between Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills like White Elephants” and Margret Atwood “Happy Endings” will be formulated, and reviewed journals from EBSCO data base and academic sources used to inquire on all the required information in relation to literally setting in the two stories. Contrary, Ernest Hemingway’s “Hills Like White Elephants” also has its uniqueness by using symbolism which readers find contradicting the narrative’s meaning (Wyche 59-70). Thus, the paper creates a clear understanding as to why Margaret Atwood decided on the title and the content (Atwood 290). In “Happy Endings” most readers might find it contradicting, since it is one story with different contexts in it. To be precise, the paper aims at making the two papers more interesting by illustrating how the stories are different. However, the paper uses literature settings such as imagery, symbolism, characters, and gender differences to understand how the two stories share various properties. The purpose thereby, is not on stating the obvious, but rather illuminates subtle differences and unexpected similarities. Furthermore, the paper compares two stories to choose and understand how the subjects connect in a meaningful manner. The main focus of this paper is comparing and contrasting two stories from different authors, “Happy Endings and Hills like White Elephants.” However, the goal is on interacting with the fiction’s environment to understand how perfect each author focuses on literature setting. At first I was puzzled of the basis of the entire narrative, but it took an exceptional perception to realize that the couple was arguing about having an abortion. The narrative has a deeper and contradicting meaning, and makes it difficult for readers to understand its content. On the other hand, I decided on a story by Ernest Hemingway “Hills Like White Elephants” because I find it more complicated as well as symbolic. Nonetheless, “Happy Endings” reflects individual’s life where, one falls in love, marries, owns a home, gets kids, retires and eventually dies. The purpose of many versions is to ensure that everyone is satisfied, and Atwood avoided gender discrimination in her writing (Atwood 289). Furthermore, the narrative itself is unique as compared to others because it has multiple plots, and each story has a different version. I choose this story because as a reader I understand clearly that, the middle of the story is the fundamental part which is unique. “Happy Endings” is an interesting short story by Margaret Atwood, which aims at showing that the end of a narrative is not as important as the middle.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |